Sunday, April 18, 2010
First Week Back After Spring Break
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
6th Day
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Second Day of Inquiry Plan
Sunday, February 28, 2010
TASK FIVE
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Domain 2
- The component from the domain I am most comfortable with is creating an environment of respect and rapport. I have always been able to build a strong rapport with my students relatively quickly. I see my students as “little people” which I think helps to develop a mutual respect between us.
- I believe the component from this domain that most strongly ties to instruction is establishing a culture for learning. When a teacher is excited about learning the students are excited about learning. When the students have a clear understanding of the goals and purpose of each lesson I believe they feel more willing to do their best and work as hard as they can. As stated in this part of the chapter a culture for learning implies high expectations for all students. This combined with a positive classroom environment allows students to take risks and reach that higher level of learning.
- I would like to focus on managing classroom procedure. I feel this is a weak point in my teaching. I am interested in reading about how I can improve upon this component to create the best learning environment possible for my students.
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Task Two
The purpose of curriculum is to guide teaching; provide teachers with clear goals of what is to be accomplished in the classroom. We, as teachers, are the implementers. We put the curriculum into action. We are given a document and it's our job to decide the best way to use it. This means that all teachers, I believe, should be implementing curriculum differently. I believe this because all students are different therefore all classrooms are different; which means that in order to meet the needs of students our instructional strategies should be varied. Even though we are all teaching the same content (at each grade level) the way we deliver it should often look very different.
I do not believe we have as much control in designing curriculum as we should. I agree with the J. Curriculum Studies article that the more teachers are involved in developing the curriculum the better understanding there will be. If teachers are teaching something they understand and more importantly believe in; better teaching practices will occur.
The curriculum that I have I enjoy teaching. I feel everything that goes on in my classroom is relevant and important. I provide real-life examples to my students as often as I can so they understand not only the content but the reason why they should know it. There are some things that are not in the curriculum that I do teach because I feel it is important-such as manners, good character, ect. My goal as a teacher is to not only provide the students with the curriculum they need but also skills and life lessons in order for them to be well rounded individuals.
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Task One (Article Reflection)
|
Since entering the undergraduate program at NKU I have heard the word curriculum. As I took more classes I began to understand what curriculum really was. It wasn't until I began teaching when I felt I fully understood the meaning of curriculum. I found these articles insightful and was surprised to read how in-depth curriculum actually is. We need to consider curriculum because I feel it is the basis of any meaningful education program. Without curriculum educators do not have a "guide" to lead his or her instruction. The type of curriculum is also important and as we know, varies from district to district; state to state. One curriculum may not be better than the other. However, after reading these articles it appears that curriculum should never be left unexamined. In other words, a curriculum can always be improved upon, just like the teacher themselves. I feel that a fused curriculum fits my current role best (as a second grade teacher). As we all know, there is never enough time in the day. In order to get Science or Social Studies in every day (or close to it) I integrate it into my Reading Centers each week. I also try to intertwine (or fuse) reading and writing as well. I try to find a common theme among the subjects each week. Something as simple as: "This week our story is about a little girls who draws pictures of winter to cool her neighbors down in the hot summer weather." So, in Science this week we will be learning about....you guessed it....weather! I am most attracted to this model I would say but I also enjoyed reading about an open curriculum. I try to engage my students in conversations often and try to allow them to generate as many of their own questions as possible. It's limited of course with 2nd graders. I can imagine how interesting this type of curriculum is in a high school or even middle school classroom. It seems that an open curriculum would create excitement about learning. A "modern" curriculum appears to be one that is hands-on. One that allows for higher-level thinking and going beyond the text book. I have to say that I do like this approach. I have always felt that teaching should be student centered. Kids/young adults need to get "their hands in it", I feel, in order to truly understand the concept being taught. That in addition to the building of questions. Meaning, the teacher asks a question that in-turn triggers another, and that another, and so on. As a teacher there is nothing more exciting than seeing your students excited. The "modern" approach, I think, would be a way to make that happen. |
|